27 Kasım 2012 Salı

TSA 'Business As Usual," Defending the Indefensible. Again

To contact us Click HERE


I bend over backwards at times giving the TSA the benefit of the doubt, including in its remarkably timid responses to the guns that more people are trying to bring through checkpoints because those people think they have a God-given "right to carry" their firearms anywhere they choose, including onto an airplane.

TSA=We're vigilant about old ladies in wheelchairs, but we're terrified about upsetting the gun lobby.

Now here, as if to prove that the TSA just doesn't make sense many times, is the agency's intrepid mouthpiece, "Blogger Bob" Burns, defending the indefensible -- that is, he airily waves off protests about TSA agents waylaying passengers as they queue to board airplanes, and "testing" whatever beverages they have in hand.

Now, it's a given that if you have a soda or a bottle of water in hand at the gate, you have purchased or obtained that drink within the secure area of the airport, because they wouldn't have let you carry it through the checkpoint in the first place. The TSA says, as a matter of optics and a tactic of preemptively covering its butt, that of course nothing is "100 percent secure," yada-yada. Yes, that is correct. Except when the TSA has some asinine gate-theater to defend, and then it's "CSI Airport."

"Blogger Bob" is correct in saying that this is nothing new, despite the current outpouring of online protest about the agency testing drinks at the gate. And, let note here the absolutely predictable response from the Brigade of Official Reassurance on public radio that there's nothing to see here, folks. Why, silly, the government told us so!

Yes, they have had this ludicrous procedure in place for a while -- but my guess is that they've stepped up the performances lately of this particular comic act on the security-vaudeville playbill.

Agents waylaying passengers at the gate may be designed to present "another layer of security," as "Blogger Bob" says, but in fact what we, the public, see is another ridiculous manifestation of make-work for a vastly bloated federal jobs program, the TSA -- which is without doubt the most hated agency of the federal government. The most hated, yes. The possibly also the least trusted. And lack of trust in your security is a basic security flaw, as any expert in the field will tell you.

Here's "Blogger Bob" on the TSA blog today, pooh-poohing objections to this nonsense by insisting that this all is "business as usual." Business of security theater as usual, I would add.

Emphasis is mine:

"While browsing the web this morning, I saw that the topic de jour was that TSA was now screening liquids at the gate. We've talked about random gate screening here before, and if you travel frequently, you've likely experienced a gate screening. Not a big deal really... Heck, even I have been pulled aside for random gate screening.
So, the most popular question that comes up with this topic is: "Isn't this redundant?" On the surface, it does seem that way, and it's the first logical thought that many have. However, any security expert will tell you that nothing is ever 100% secure. So, gate screening is kind of like our safety net to keep up with anybody who might be trying to get things past conventional screening.
We stay away from static security tactics. Layered security is common practice, providing the necessary unpredictable measure that makes it more difficult to do malice to the transportation infrastructure. If everything we did was always the same, it would provide a checklist for people to know exactly what to expect. While this would be extremely helpful for passengers, it would also be useful to those wishing to do us harm. ...

As far as the testing of liquids at the gate, this is just one of the many options we have to choose from when deciding what additional tactics to use each day. We started using test strips back in the summer of 2007 and continue to do so. The test involves a test strip and a dropper containing a nontoxic solution. In case you're wondering, our officers don't place the test strips in your beverages/liquids. They simply have the passenger remove the cap/lid and they hold the strip over the opening of the container. Procedures call for moving the test strip to the side and applying the solution from the dropper to test the strip. If the test results are positive TSA will conduct additional testing to make a final assessment.
In a nutshell, liquid screening at gates is random and it isn't happening at every airport every day. So other than possibly taking a few moments of your time before boarding your flight, it's business as usual."

###

Border Patrol Nabs Castro Sneaking Dirty Bomb Into U.S. ... Oops! Make That Ex-Arizona Gov. Castro, 96, and He'd Just Had Radiation Treatment

To contact us Click HERE
[Photo: Mr. Castro, the suspect in suspected nuclear-bomb plot that was thwarted by vigilant U.S. Border Patrol agents]

The former governor of Arizona, 96-year-old Raul Castro, of Nogales, Ariz., was waylaid recently by intrepid agents of the U.S. Border Patrol in southern Arizona, where they don't have as much to do these days because fewer Mexicans are risking death illegally trudging 100 miles through the brutal heat of the Sonoran Desert.

A radiation detector, it seems, signaled some radiation on the elderly gentleman's person during one of those pesky stops by the Border Patrol agents who are all over the region.
Governor Castro, it seems, was emitting traces of radiation from a medical procedure. So he was detained and humiliated in the 100-degree heat because he could have posed a "nuclear threat" to the Homeland.

This occurred a good ways from the border itself on Interstate 19 north of Tubac, Ariz. (Border Patrol claims to have martial-law authority in a zone within 100 miles of the border, which includes the city of Tucson.)

You think I'm kidding? Read this.

Mr. Castro was elected in 1974 as the first (and only) Mexican-American governor of Arizona. He is also a former U.S. ambassador to Argentina, Bolivia and El Salvador.

This appalling incident has been well-known in the area since it occurred three weeks ago, and I've been amazed that the national media ignored it for so long, till it got picked up out of a local Nogales publication. (The Phoenix and Tuscon media are too lazy and too craven to rouse themselves much and report this out. They're afraid some right-wing screwball might write them a stern letter of complaint, after all.)

Finally, Salon has got on the case. Here.

###

Thank You from American Airlines: Those Old Miles That Were Never Supposed to Expire? They're Expiring! !

To contact us Click HERE
I will never, ever understand the propensity of airlines for clumsily insulting the intelligence of their customers. The tin-ear syndrome is always on full display.

Here's a beauty that one Suzanne L. Rubin, who runs the AAdvantage loyalty program, sent out in e mails to customers, thanking them for their loyalty while advising them that those "miles with no expiration" will now expire. It's a "streamline," she says!

***

"For more than 30 years the American Airlines AAdvantage program has been making travel special. Thank you for your loyalty for so many years as an AAdvantage member.

In order to streamline our program, we are announcing a change to AAdvantage miles earned before July 1, 1989, also called Miles With No Expiration.

Starting November 1, 2012, these miles will automatically be converted to Miles Subject to Expiration, and because of your tenured loyalty, you will earn a 25% mileage bonus on every unredeemed mile earned prior to July 1, 1989. To have your Miles With No Expiration converted and to earn the mileage bonus, you do not need to take any action. For more information about this change, please visit AA.com/MileConversion.

Once your miles have been converted, as long as you earn or redeem AAdvantage miles at least once every 18 months, your miles will not expire. This is our normal mileage policy and more information can be found at AA.com/AAdvantageTerms.

It is easy to keep your account active! In addition to earning AAdvantage miles for travel, you can earn miles for making everyday purchases such as dining out, shopping and paying your electricity bill. Plus, you can redeem miles for hotel stays, rental cars, flight awards, and more! Find out more ways to earn and redeem miles by visiting AA.com/AAdvantage.


...Thank you for your continued loyalty!

Sincerely,

Suzanne L. Rubin
President
AAdvantage® Loyalty Program"

###

Border Patrol's Deadly Response to Rock-Throwing from Mexican Side

To contact us Click HERE
The Los Angeles Times, unlike the timid local daily papers in Arizona, is following up on the disturbing story of Border Patrol agents riddling a teenager's body with bullets, when that teenager was in a group of rock-tossing Mexicans on the other side of the international border at Nogales.

From today's Los Angeles Times report (Emphasis mine): "Under agency guidelines, repelling rock attacks with bullets can be regarded as a justifiable use of force in part because rocks have inflicted serious injuries on agents. But critics have grown increasingly vocal at the frequency of such incidents and what they call a lack of transparency in follow-up investigations. Wednesday's confrontation was the third incident since September; at least 15 civilians have died in agent-involved confrontations since 2010."

Not addressed yet, and it won't be addressed cogently unless the national media pay attention to this dismaying story that the local daily media are evidently afraid to touch: Why couldn't Border Patrol agents simply have retreated to a spot where the rocks could not reach them, given that the assailants were unable to advance (being on the Mexico side of the border)?

--Also, how many shots did the Border Patrol fire? The dead youth's body was hit with eight gunshots, Mexican authorities said, while at least a dozen more bullets hit a medical building nearby on the Mexican side.

--Also, what was the specific threat that the Border Patrol agents say they responded to? Again, throwing rocks at someone is a crime -- a local crime. Firing wildly across an international border is an international incident, whatever the other questions of manslaughter and inadequate training.

--Also, see the Los Angeles Tiomes story linked to above, which refers to the dead 16-year-old as the "suspected smuggler." There is no attribution for that, and no indication from the reporting that the dead youth was in fact a "suspected smuggler" (though he may have been, of course). In which casse, the crime location was on the Mexican side of the border, Mexican law enforcement was the legal authority, and the question still remains about the use of deadly force, which seems to have included a hail of bullets.  However, from the facts as they have currently been presented, it appears that the 16-year-old was part of a small group of people who tossed rocks at the agents across the border fence. -- in response to what would have been the Border Patrol agents' legitimate attempts to capture on this side, or repel, the actual smugglers who tossed a bundle of what seems to have been marijuana across the fence.

Again, why couldn't the agents have simply retreated from the rocks? Who gave the order to fire?

Less sloppy reporting is required here, on a sensitive topic.

###

Can someone define ';Disney Magic';

To contact us Click HERE

On another thread much has been talked about Disney Magic in the context of Orlando WDW versus other parks.





I don%26#39;t really get this concept. I enjoy Universal IOA much more than Disney %26amp; I take it it has no Disney Magic?





I think holiday magic comes from yourself and those with you.





So what constitutes Disney Magic?





Answers on a postcard please!



Can someone define ';Disney Magic';


Jenni, I never got it either. We had a great time at WDW, but then we have a great time wherever we go. I agree with you, the magic comes from being with our kids and doing the family thing. Some folks just really get in to it I guess. These folks also seem to kind of get offended when you just don%26#39;t get the %26#39;magic%26#39;. That other forum (the one I think you are talking about) is serious about their %26#39;magic%26#39; and some folks seem to be on the verge of tears when their family members don%26#39;t understand their %26#39;magic%26#39; feelings.



Can someone define ';Disney Magic';


Jenni-





Personally ive found Disney at Orlando being one of the few must do%26#39;s in your life. Paris is much closer but wouldn%26#39;t be the same.





That said, we%26#39;ve been there and now done it and personally its been more of experiencing very good theme parks in quick succession.





Mickey and gang are not really up to it these days since they seem to belong to the generation gone.





My kids are more into Dora the Explorer and co and if they were part of Disney then they would have enjoyed even more since they could directly relate to the character!




It%26#39;s like believing or not believing in Santa.





If you believe, you have the magic surrounding you. If you don%26#39;t believe, well, you%26#39;re missing the whole thing.




Disney magic depends for adults on their childhood memories. As a little girl i was mesmerised by cinderella, beauty and the beast etc... not everyone has disney imprinted on their memories. My boyfriend had no connection with disney or the %26#39;magic%26#39; but still had an awesome time





I think disney magic does exist for some but its not essential, you need good company to enjoy anything.




Trying to take it apart, here%26#39;s what I get:





Magic Kingdom is the model for the ';Disney Magic'; in my book; other Disney parks go with or against the below principles in different ways





Appealing to idealized notions of royalty and romance





';########'; childhood dreams (flying like Peter Pan and Tinkerbell)





Old time idealized notions of America and the American Dream, and progress (sort of a non-sectarian non-violent postmillenialism) without being so ';futuristic'; and ';cool'; (though Disney is not immune to trying to be ';futuristic'; and ';cool';); yet nostalgic; of course, thinking about old time notions of progress above things is nostalgic (think ';Main Street USA'; and ';Carosel of Progress';)





Emphasis on talking animals and Disney characters and cartoons that aren%26#39;t so ';violent'; or ';dangerous'; (like Looney Toons or ';Itchy and Scratchy';)





To some extent, tending toward a traditional understanding of beauty and childlike simplicity over ugliness (the Old lady in snow white as an exception); even the villans in the non-Disney things tend to be more artistic than the villans in other fantasy movies and animated features (one example: compare the Buzz Lightyear ride to the Men in Black Alien Attack and you%26#39;ll see the difference; one is more colorful and pretty in some ways; the other is cooler, more advanced, and the targets are uglier).





And, of course, a childlike utopianism about different nations and cultures coming together (';Its a Small World'; of course)





And also a more straightfoward way of looking at and talking about things (not the snappy quick at times over kids head and ';wicked humor of ';The Simpsons'; and ';Family Guy'; animated series).





To some extent, ';tenderness'; ';gentleness'; and being nice over against Endeavour105 type behavior (lol!)





Also, the relative ';innocence'; and childlike atmosphere of not serving beer at Magic Kingdom





To some extent, all these things rolled together somehow make up ';Disney Magic';. Yet there are some things which don%26#39;t necessarily go with these things, yet get rolled up in Disney magic (';Pirates of the Caribbean';, for example, appeals to childhood dreams, but is hardly ';########';, though it is somewhat idealistic)



Tomorrowland is futuristic, but in an almost quaint way





This is my somewhat ';clumsy'; attempt to define the Disney Magic.



Of course, Disney as a company and movie studio goes with or against these virtues at any time. It seems that in the Pixar era it has at times completely jettisoned these things, but not as fast as say other studios have; ';The Incredibles'; may be cool, but not as hip as, say ';Madagascar';.





Also, I personally hypothesize that Magic Kingdom is more of a park for adults rather than kids. Its more for adults who want to become a child again in some ways, or want to live vicariously as a child through their children. That%26#39;s why so many people bring young kids who can%26#39;t or may not remember what is going on; its more for the adults than kids. And adults are more capable of feeling the nostalga that Disney brings than kids are, though kids can be taught to be nostalgic too.




And, as referred to above (I meant to say it but forgot to type it, I think), the idea of being a child living in a fairy tale.




Disney Magic: As you enter the park, you wallet like magic comes out of your pocket, opens, and by the time you leave all of your money disappears!




I don%26#39;t think it makes any difference who you are. Anything your heart desires will come to you if your heart is in your dream. No request is too extreme - Fate is kind; She brings the sweet fulfillment of secret longing like a bolt out of the blue.





In summary, Fate steps in and sees you through and when you wish upon a star your dreams come true, and that%26#39;s how I guess I would define it (without straying from the topic).





I%26#39;m actually thinking of marketing this reply as a Disney song if I can tone it down a little. If Phil Collins is reading this, please get in touch, or tell Elton.




It is the look in your little girls eyes as tinkerbell starts her descent from the fairy tale castle.





That is the magic.




Recipe for Disney Magic...



1 cup Goofy



1 cup nostalgia



1/2 cup pixie dust



8 oz winter chill, warmed



3 1/2 (1 lb) bag %26#39;o cash



Grease body with sunblock. Cover head with mouse ears. Mix parks as directed on park hopper. Pour money out of wallet. Mix Dole Whips with funnel cakes and shake on Everest. Add Zantac and mix with Mountain Dew. Spoon over... well lets not go there. Bake 10 hours at 90 degrees. Cool completely in resort%26#39;s pool.

26 Kasım 2012 Pazartesi

The Most Important Question About Benghazi

To contact us Click HERE
Skirt-chasing and email-romances are silly distractions.

Let's go back to The MOST Important Question About Benghazi:  What happened to the rescue?  (Hint:  the C-in-C deliberately failed to issue the right order.)

Fortunately, this blog is on that like stripe on a skunk--and a skunk it is.

...There are a number of disparate timelines being floated by various sources (I’ve seen most or all of them), and sooner or later the truth will come out. ...

(Quoting a Fox News report):

The Pentagon says that the European-based team of rescuers landed at Sigonella air base at 7:57 p.m. on Sept. 12, more than 20 hours after the attack began and 40 minutes after the last survivor was flown out of Tripoli on a U.S. C-17 transport plane...The group ordered toward Libya was from the Charlie 110 Company, based in Stuttgart, Germany, but had been training in Croatia...

Military sources familiar with the orders given to the CIF team tell Fox News the CIF plane headed to Libya — not to first stage at Sigonella as the Pentagon timeline suggests....

...Multiple defense sources say that the plane did not have permission to enter Libya. That permission would have to be secured from the Libyans by the State Department.

Survivors of the attack at the annex say that they heard over the radio net that night that U.S. military assets were, “feet dry over Libya,” which would refer to assets crossing from sea to land and hovering. The Pentagon denies this.

That last graf corresponds with the testimony of an ex-SF operator who has stated that only the C-in-C can give 'cross border authority' to execute a mission.  In fact, without such an order, any SF action can NOT proceed.

Obama lied.  Four died--not counting Mexican civilians in his Gun Adventure Games.

Reading Coulter Out: It's Overdue

To contact us Click HERE
Levin finally lowered the boom on the Blond Screecher.

Fact is Romney has done nothing for conservatism. I repeat, nothing. No leadership. No grassroots efforts. No major policy initiatives. Nothing. Reagan won two landslides. Romney won nothing. Cherry-picking facts Ann, in some strange cult-like obsession, fools no one. Same with your cheerleading for Chris Christie.

In the last couple of years, Coulter lifted her skirts far enough to reveal the Rockefeller tattoo.  And Levin called her on it.

About time.

HT:  Gateway